Observational Learning
Definition
Observational learning is the acquisition of behaviour, knowledge or expectations from watching a model: a parent, peer, teacher or character on a screen.
Bandura separated four processes, all of which must work for imitation to occur:
- Attention: the model and the behaviour have to be noticed.
- Retention: the behaviour is stored, as images or verbal codes.
- Reproduction: the observer has the physical and cognitive ability to perform it.
- Motivation: the observer expects the behaviour to pay off.
The key distinction is between learning and performance. A person can learn a behaviour by watching and never perform it, until the incentive changes.
History
Early learning theory held that behaviour had to be performed and reinforced to be learned. Miller and Dollard's 1941 account of imitation still framed it as reinforced responding.
Bandura's Bobo doll studies in the early 1960s showed children reproducing novel aggressive acts, including specific words and actions, after only watching an adult. A 1965 follow-up showed that children who saw the model punished imitated less, but reproduced the acts readily once offered a reward, which is the learning-performance distinction in its clearest form.
Bandura developed this into social learning theory in 1977 and later into social cognitive theory, where self-efficacy became central.
Theory
The mechanism is vicarious reinforcement: seeing a model rewarded or punished changes the observer's expectations about their own outcomes, without the observer experiencing those outcomes.
This was a decisive step away from strict behaviourism, because it requires internal representations — a stored model of the act and an expectation about its results — to explain behaviour that was never itself reinforced.
Models are imitated more when they are similar to the observer, higher in status, competent, and rewarded.
Research
The core effect — that watching a behaviour increases its likelihood — is well established across many domains, from motor skills to phobic avoidance to prosocial acts.
The media violence literature grew directly from the Bobo doll work, and it is where the evidence is most disputed. Meta-analyses report small positive associations between violent media exposure and aggression, but effect sizes shrink in preregistered studies and in studies with better aggression measures, and the association with serious real-world violence is not supported.
Modelling is one of the most effective components of skills training and of exposure-based treatment for fear.
Applications
Participant modelling in the treatment of phobias, where a therapist demonstrates approach before the client tries it.
Skills training in medicine, sport and social skills programmes, which rely heavily on demonstration followed by practice and feedback.
Public health campaigns that show a relatable person performing a behaviour, rather than instructing people to do it.
Criticism
- The Bobo doll is a toy designed to be hit. Hitting it is not obviously aggression, and the studies are weaker evidence about violence than their fame suggests.
- Demand characteristics. Children may reproduce what they believe the adults want to see.
- The jump to media violence has been made far more confidently than the evidence supports.
- Learning versus performance is hard to measure, because learning is usually inferred from performance.
References
- Bandura, A., Ross, D., & Ross, S. A. (1961). Transmission of aggression through imitation of aggressive models. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 63(3), 575-582.
- Bandura, A. (1965). Influence of models' reinforcement contingencies on the acquisition of imitative responses. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1(6), 589-595.
- Bandura, A. (1977). Social Learning Theory. Prentice-Hall.
- Ferguson, C. J. (2015). Do angry birds make for angry children? A meta-analysis of video game influences on children's and adolescents' aggression, mental health, prosocial behavior, and academic performance. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 10(5), 646-666.